Depth 4 Lower Bounds, Determinantal Complexity : A Unified Approach

Author

S. Chillara, and P. Mukhopadhyay

Published

March 2, 2014

Link to the article

Authors

Suryajith Chillara and Partha Mukhopadhyay

Publisher Information

Abstract

Tavenas has recently proved that any n^{O(1)}-variate and degree n polynomial in VP can be computed by a depth 4 \Sigma\Pi\Sigma\Pi circuit of size 2^{O(\sqrt{n}\log n)} (see Tavenas (2013)). So, to prove VP\neq VNP it is sufficient to show that an explicit polynomial in VNP of degree n requires 2^{\omega(\sqrt{n}\log n)} size depth 4 circuits. Soon after Tavenas’ result, for two different explicit polynomials, depth 4 circuit size lower bounds of 2^{\Omega(\sqrt{n}\log n)} have been proved (see Kayal-Saha-Saptharishi (2013) and Fournier-Limaye-Malod-Srinivasan (2013)). In particular, using combinatorial design Kayal et al. construct an explicit polynomial in VNP that requires depth 4 circuits of size 2^{\Omega(\sqrt{n}\log n)} and Fournier et al. show that the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial (which is in VP) also requires 2^{\Omega(\sqrt{n}\log n)} size depth 4 circuits.

In this paper, we identify a simple combinatorial property such that any polynomial f that satisfies this property would achieve a similar depth 4 circuit size lower bound. In particular, it does not matter whether f is in VP or in VNP. As a result, we get a simple unified lower bound analysis for the above mentioned polynomials.

Another goal of this paper is to compare our current knowledge of the depth 4 circuit size lower bounds and the determinantal complexity lower bounds. Currently the best known determinantal complexity lower bound is \Omega(n^2) for Permanent of a n\times n matrix (which is a n^2-variate and degree n polynomial) (due to Cai, Chen and Li (2008)). We prove that the determinantal complexity of the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial is \Omega(dn) where d is the number of matrices and n is the dimension of the matrices. So for d=n, we get that the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial achieves the current best known lower bounds in both fronts: depth 4 circuit size and determinantal complexity. Our result also settles the determinantal complexity of the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial to \Theta(dn).

To the best of our knowledge, a \Theta(n) bound for the determinantal complexity for the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial was known only for any constant d>1 (cf. Jansen (2011)).